It Is Risky to Bash Trump on Talk Radio
Here is the latter section of this topical comment on the US Republican nomination by Leonid Bershidsky for Bloomberg:
This split among the most popular hosts isn't helping the Republicans, making it harder for the conservative base to fall in behind a single candidate. But if Trump is acceptable to the loudest voices of talk radio, he's acceptable to the listeners, too -- and that's why Kaminsky is getting those angry emails and calls.
"They may come to regret it later, but they may not," Kaminsky says of his federally-famous colleagues who have chosen not to attack Trump. "If Trump becomes president, there will be a lot to talk about. Now, the country will be going to hell in a handbasket, but there will be a lot to talk about."
I can't help thinking that's the case with the mainstream media, too. There's no way around it: Trump is entertaining and fun to talk about. The ensuing airtime has made him more acceptable as a potential President than he should ever have been.
Talk radio was set up as an alternative to the liberal mainstream. With Trump, though -- perhaps because it's so highly commercialized -- it has fallen into the same trap as the mainstream of tempting Americans to merge entertainment and politics in the important business of choosing who should run the country.
I will let venerable Charlie Munger, vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway respond.
On Trump: “My attitude is that anybody who makes money running a casino is not morally qualified.”
On Sanders: “I don’t think he’s any worse than some of our Republicans. But at least they’re crazy in a different way.”
Back to top