Europe Learns To Like Hard Brexit and a Good British Ally
Here is the opening of this interesting article by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard for The Telegraph:
The Brexit drama has taken an unexpected twist. Britain's strategy of full withdrawal from the single market and from the EU institutions has been remarkably well-received.
Contrary to fears in some quarters in Britain, the pursuit of a 'clean and hard' Brexit has if anything helped to clear the air, greeted with a degree of relief by political and business leaders in Europe.
What has changed the mood - apart from the passage of time - is the parallel pledge by Britain's leaders to stand beside Europe as a close strategic and military ally, playing its full part in upholding a rules-based global architecture.
There were signs at the World Economic Forum in Davos that the anger of recent months is slowly draining away, replaced by an acknowledgement of Britain's distinctive history and character. The imperative now is to limit the damage for all sides and find a way to make the new arrangement work. Not all divorces end in hostility.
Emma Marcegaglia, head of the pan-EU federation BusinessEurope, said the no-nonsense nature of Britain's decision may prove to be the best outcome even if it is hard to accept on an emotional level.
"When I first saw Theresa May's speech my reaction was very bad, and I thought this is going to cause serious problems for British companies and for the rest of us," she said.
"But after thinking about it I now feel that her position is very straight and clear. In a certain sense it clarifies the situation. There could now be a good free trade agreement, like the Canadian arrangement with access for both sides and social protection," she told the Telegraph.
"It is all so sad. We're going to miss the role of the UK in defending free trade and competition. The British commissioner was always a crucial ally for us in Brussels. But it is done now, and we just have to accept it," she said.
Last week, Prime Minister Theresa May seized the initiative in Brexit negotiations with the EU. She said matter of factly that the UK was leaving the EU, and that no deal was better than a bad deal. She could not have been clearer. She was also constructive in pointing out that Britain was leaving the EU, not Europe. There was no anger or animosity in her words or voice, and she wished the EU well.
Emma Marcegaglia’s summary above describes the transformation of EU opinions occurring at Davos. An independent Britain can be a useful ally for the EU. That is in Europe’s interests.
Here is a PDF of AEP’s column.
Back to top